[ad_1]
A British judge on Monday allowed an appeals court to consider a challenge to the British government’s plan to send some asylum seekers on a one-way trip to Rwanda.
Two high court judges ruled in December that the controversial policy was legal, dismissing lawsuits from several asylum seekers, aid groups, and border workers’ unions. The same judge said Monday that plaintiffs could challenge the decision on issues such as whether the plan was “systemically unfair” and whether asylum seekers were safe in Rwanda. .
A date for the appeal hearing has not been set.
The Conservative government last year signed a deportation deal with Rwanda aimed at discouraging migrants from reaching Britain on the perilous journey across the English Channel. In 2022 he will cross the Channel to reach Britain with over 45,000 people, several dead.
The UK plans to send stowaways or some migrants arriving in small boats to Rwanda, where asylum applications will be processed. Those granted asylum remain in the East African country rather than returning to the UK.
The British government claims the policy will deter criminal gangs ferrying migrants from the perilous journey across one of the world’s busiest sea lanes.
Human rights groups say it is immoral and inhumane to send people to a country they don’t want to live more than 4,000 miles (6,400 km) away. They also cite Rwanda’s poor human rights record, including allegations of torture and the killing of government opponents. .
Britain has already paid £140m ($170m) to Rwanda under a deal signed in April, but has yet to send anyone to the country. The UK was forced to cancel its first deportation flight at the last minute in June after the European Court of Human Rights ruled the plan carried a “real risk of irreparable harm”.
Last month, the High Court said the policy did not violate Britain’s obligations under the UN Refugee Convention and other international agreements.
But the judge added that the government “has to decide whether there is something about each person’s particular circumstances”, which means they should not be sent to Rwanda.
[ad_2]
Source link
