[ad_1]
don’t have to stare too much twitter Finding out who disagrees with you is the same even when teens are playing NCAA sports.
Sometimes it’s just someone looking for engagement, sometimes it’s someone with no intention of engaging and only interested in ruining your day. Social media has opened many doors for people to connect with friends they may have lost contact with and strangers who share interests, but it can also be a hateful, absolute hell. I have.
If you want to see just how awful a place social media can be, just scroll through the messages and replies about athletes missing important shots and field goals. Recently, harassment of athletes has been attracting attention again, triggered by an incident involving an online attack on athletes. University of Dayton Men’s basketball team after the fall Virginia Commonwealth University (VCUs) after waking up 14 point.
Athlete harassment is nothing new, but there seems to be a perception among regulators and sports officials that it has been on the rise since 2018. Murphy Decisions about sports betting.
a long history of bad behavior
The threat to athletes from angry bettors and fantasy players existed before the recent rise of unregulated sports betting. NevadaWhile this is not a problem limited to the United States, it is now in the spotlight as regulators and sports officials have spoken out about the practice.
Back in 2017, Richard Sherman spoke about the treatment NFL players receive from some fantasy players, and how they appear to be devalued as human beings because of fantasy sports. spoke out emphatically about
Harassment of athletes seems to be happening all the time, but the anonymity of the internet has created a larger shelter for people to vent their hate. It also acted as a mechanism that allowed the worst personality traits of the character to come out.
Again, this is not a sport-specific issue, nor is it specific to the sports betting universe. However, the world of sports betting seems to be uniquely positioned to deal with harassment.
Build so far
it was only a few years ago Darren Lovell Other reporters have made a young sports bettor named Sports Bettor a celebrity. Ben Patz, hit the seemingly impossible parlay with incredible success. Patz gained a lot of attention for betting all odds and succeeding, but he was under investigation by the FBI for a series of threats against professional and NCAA athletes. plead guilty.
Most recently, the University of Dayton’s men’s basketball team stepped into the spotlight after coaching. Anthony Grant After a disappointing loss to VCU, he vented his frustration to reporters about the harassment his players received.
Grant’s comments and complaints not only caught the attention of national media, but also the attention of at least one member. Ohio Casino Regulatory Commissionis emerging as one of the country’s watchful regulators.
What will the NCAA do about harassment of professional athletes?
It goes without saying that no one should harass an athlete. They don’t care about your bet or your fantasy team.
The executive director of Ohio’s casino governing board reportedly suggested that bettors found to be harassing players online could be banned from betting in the state. This seems like a positive start.
This will not eradicate harassers from gambling, but knowing that there are alternatives to the regulated market, the regulated market will take a stand against harassers and rehabilitate them wherever possible. You must be excluded from participation until
one step ahead
I would go a step further and propose mandatory rehabilitation education for non-malicious offenders. Those who engage in harassing behavior can first have their suspension lifted through classes similar to those used by the state for drivers arrested for driving under the influence. Subsequent violations will mean loss of ability to bet on the regulated market.
To add strength to these types of measures, states should work on information sharing across jurisdictions and promote bettor ban interrelationships.
Low-level offenders may be rehabilitated through education, but the most egregious harassers who threaten violence should be prosecuted. The threat of violence should have zero tolerance.
Professional leagues have security departments that can investigate threats, but the NCAA college sports community has modernized to ensure athletes not only have the resources to report harassment, but they know they have the resources. must be
What can states, schools, and the NCAA legally do?
Whenever possible, nations need to start taking these threats seriously to prevent tragedy.
The question of what can be legally done to put an end to this kind of behavior remains somewhat ambiguous in situations other than explicit threats of violence. Threats of bodily harm are punishable at both the state and federal (assuming there is an interstate aspect) levels.
However, less blatant behavior can rise to the level of criminal harassment. Again, online stalking and harassment are prosecutable at both the state and federal levels, provided the necessary facts are in place.
However, as we have seen from the general picture of being online, prosecutions in this area are far less common and have almost certainly not had the desired deterrent effect for many Internet users.
NCAA schools themselves could also take action by banning online harassers from attending ticketed events. Many college campuses have public spaces, but there is no general right to attend ticketed events.
Where do you go from here?
The domestic sports betting market is beginning to mature. It is going through growing pains and hard lessons are being learned.
But especially at the NCAA level, athlete protection must be a priority. If bettors are unable to participate in betting responsibly and it involves bettor losses, regulators should not allow them to bet on regulated markets.
Anyone who spends five minutes gambling on Twitter should know that they are frustrated by the restrictions and therefore have no basic right to bet. It is a privilege and it should be taken away when people cannot act responsibly.
Another consideration is using some of the state tax revenues to better fund increased prosecutions of gambling-related crimes. This undoubtedly includes threats to athletes.
[ad_2]
Source link
