[ad_1]
But both McCarthy and his internal adversary look better in light of the resolution. Among the latter, notably Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican and third term, former Chief of Staff Ted Cruz. His name recognition and influence grew during the standoff, and he would play a key role in the upcoming conflict.
I checked with Roy about what happened last week from his perspective and what it means.
For many, myself included, the seriousness of the purpose behind the Republican uprising against McCarthy is tainted by the inability of many dissidents to articulate the apocalypse or come up with alternative candidates for speakers. It was clear. Prominent roles of the likes of Matt Gates and Lauren Boubert enjoying fireworks for them were also inevitably discredited.
But it was Roy who was paying attention. He’s not a nihilist, he’s an institutionalist with a well-thought-out view of how the House should work. He wants to take leadership down a notch, allowing for more decentralized decision-making and richer debates to empower ordinary people.
At its core, this priority relates to his views on what it means to represent voters.
“If you, as a member, are deprived of your ability to submit amendments and speak up and discuss them,” Roy explains. This means that I can only “yes” or “againsts” or votes against bills put together by other people’s representatives. “
As a passionate and loyal financial hawk, he also detests the shortcuts and distortions in the process that led to the “omnibus” appropriations bills that had to be rushed through.
As the drama unfolded in the House, Roy and his Liberal caucus allies had been lobbying for the same critical set of priorities for months. Indeed, his one way of looking at last week’s fight is that it was the most intense stage of ongoing negotiations. Efforts to get Republican leaders to agree to the changes began last summer, and supporters made no secret of what they were asking for.
A memo issued by the Liberal Members of the House of Commons in July 2022 outlined the main points of the final adopted item and was addressed to colleagues in the House by Roy and several others on 8 December. The letter almost accurately predicts the final transaction by allowing one member. Make a motion to remove the chairman of the task force investigating “weaponized government”.
Roy, of course, says there are always deals going on behind the scenes in Congress — members exchanging votes for committee assignments and such — but from his perspective, this is It wasn’t: “This is what I think we need.” And we were fighting over it.
As Roy puts it, new rules for how the House GOP meeting and the House itself work. Get more conservatives on important committees — If “no conservatives question spending” on these top panels, he asks, “How are you going to make changes?” Various policy commitments to fiscal discipline.
Last summer, the opposition started thinking about how they wanted to redo the rules. They consulted with veterans and came up with a proposal presented to McCarthy. As long as the Republicans appeared to win his November by a wide enough margin, there was no incentive for the leadership to take the House Liberal caucus push seriously.
“I think they were like, ‘Yeah, we’re going to get the 230.’ [Republicans], 235, 240, certainly mid-230s and you get the power to roll over everyone raising concerns,” Roy says. “[That’s] The feeling we got because there was no real interaction in trying to fight for those rules. Speaking of November 9th, there was.
Still, leadership was confident, despite a much narrower-than-expected majority. I saw it as a way to signal that I had to negotiate, Roy recalls. i get votes And we said, ‘Kevin, you don’t have the right to vote. We need to change this place.
Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona ran as the protest candidate. His supporters thought he would get a little more than his 20 votes. Instead, he got his 31 votes. Of course, this meant McCarthy won handily, but it was a warning sign as the ballot on the floor in January was looming and he could only lose four votes.
There were meetings all November about possible rule changes. Then, in early December, five “Never Kevin’s” voiced their objections. “He used to do it with five people, but that number has increased,” says Roy.
Roy and many others did not say “no” to McCarthy because they wanted to remain flexible in finding solutions to impending deadlocks. Before Christmas, they secured agreement on some changes to House rules, but there was still controversy over allowing one vote to vacate the Speaker.
Roy calls the eviction motion “a little shiny object.” Despite being important to both sides, the focus was disproportionate. For Roy, the rules, which date back to the early days of the US Congress, are a tradition, part and part of putting more control in the hands of individual members of Congress.
However, it was clear that this would be a hard fought battle. “There was a lot of violent backlash from a quarter of the conference,” says Roy. “And Kevin himself.”
Talks and meetings continued as the January 3 vote approached, but nothing was definitive about the motion to leave – the leadership offered a threshold of five votes, but some Moderates were hesitant to go that far – or make a potential commitment with the Committee on Fiscal Policy.
Republicans held a meeting the morning before the House convened on Tuesday, but as was widely reported, it was a train wreck. “It was a terrible meeting,” says Roy. A major ally of McCarthy’s, Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama (who is the one who stormed Gates on the House floor near the end of the story) threatens to strip McCarthy’s opponents of their committee assignments. “Literally, I looked around the room for people wondering what to do,” Roy recalls. We will vote differently. “
According to Roy, the opposition’s first number of whippings was, “About a dozen of us give or take. And after that meeting on Tuesday, you saw what happened.” There were 19 people who said their names.”
“The whole operation there was saying, ‘Look, Kevin is going to force these votes and continue to force votes.’ ‘ points out Roy. I said “We have to come up with a way to break the impasse. Because here is a block that doesn’t work without either change. And for some people, it probably won’t change.”
There was a demoralizing standoff at first. “Basically, he had to prove in one day that he wasn’t going anywhere,” he says Roy. “Yeah. And all of a sudden they were like, ‘Well, shit, I have to figure this out.’ And I said, “Sit down and try to figure this out.” And our group did. “
On Wednesday, representatives from both sides began systematically working through the outstanding issues. Meanwhile, McCarthy’s losses on the House floor continued to mount. “One time on Thursday it quickly became clear that if we can’t get to a place where we can agree on some serious terms, he’s really in trouble,” recalls Roy.
Serious terms came Friday and changed everything. Suddenly McCarthy won 15 votes. “We had enough conversations,” says Roy. “I knew I was going to be in double digits, but I didn’t know I was going to be 15 until I was 15.”
The agreement essentially commemorated everything that was stated in the letter of December 8th, and in this case at least, the fight to decentralize the rules itself was fought by a relatively small number of determined members. It justifies what the group can achieve.
Roy doesn’t believe a motion to leave would be used “when there’s no really good reason and a sizeable block of co-workers are standing beside or behind us”. is on the same page as the hope that will result in a battle over spending.
They will test Republican unity in a high-pressure, high-risk situation, especially when it comes to the debt ceiling. If last week’s tussle over the Presidency is any indication, Chip Roy will be in the middle of it all, a key voice and a deciding vote.
[ad_2]
Source link
