[ad_1]
An interactive New York Times quiz saw newspaper editors voice their opinions on a variety of potentially offensive terms, including “pregnant person,” “illegal immigrant,” and “master bedroom.” I was.
A quiz titled “You Can’t Say That! (Or Can You?)” in the publication’s online opinion section was highlighted on Twitter by former investigative reporter and congressional candidate Matthew Foldi.
The quiz asked users if they would use certain words or phrases and presented results based on Morning Consult’s research on terminology. One question asked whether participants used the words ‘master bedroom’ or ‘primary bedroom’.
AP Stylebook updates guidelines to include ‘pregnant women’, upsetting both conservatives and liberals
The New York Times quiz asks participants whether they use the words “master bedroom” or “master bedroom.”
(New York Times)
84% of participants said they would use the term “master bedroom” and 49% said they would use the term “master bedroom”. The quiz also mentioned that there has been a move in recent years to replace the term “master bedroom” with “primary bedroom”, as some feel there is a racial history of the former.
Another question asked whether participants would use the terms ‘birth parent’ or ‘breastfeeding’ rather than ‘pregnant woman’ or ‘breastfeeding’ in a more inclusive sense.
86% of US respondents said they would use “pregnant woman” and 66% said they would not use “birth parent”. Additionally, “chest feeding” was overwhelmingly negative, with 90% of respondents saying they never use the term.
After completing the quiz, the web page unlocks comments where members of the Times Opinion team discuss how they felt about the terms found throughout the quiz.
Quoctrung Bui, the Times Opinion’s graphics editor, recalled discussing with colleagues whether to use “pregnant person” instead of “pregnant woman” when working on an article on abortion. I remembered.
“On the one hand, we wanted to make fertile trans men more inclusive, but given the vast majority of abortions being performed by women and how important this issue has been for women historically. And I didn’t want to erase the woman,” he said.
University language guide says ‘grandfather’, ‘housework’ and ‘spirit beast’ are ‘problematic’ words
New York Times quizzes are presented with terms such as “pregnant women” and “parents in childbearing”.
(New York Times)
Bui also commented on the term “illegal alien”. In the survey results, this word was expressed as ‘curve ball’.
“I thought most people had stopped using the term,” Bui said, noting that Time magazine removed the phrase from its own style guide in 2013.
The Times Opinion’s contributing editor, Jessica Bennett, recently admitted to using the term “pro-life” on her podcast, but quickly corrected it to say “anti-abortion.”
Despite her own language crackdown, Bennett said it was difficult to keep up with the current verbal controversy, questioning, “Who makes the rules anyway?”
Times Opinion graphics editor Sarah Chodosh said she was “surprised” to learn that nearly three-quarters of Americans said they would use the term “third world country.”
“To me, it’s a misunderstanding of the original Cold War-era meaning, and it’s also an outdated and rather offensive phrase,” she added.
On the other hand, The Times Opinion writer on language, John McWhirter, often found himself quietly refuting the language of accepted left-wing ideologies. At one point in the comments, McWhorter argued that the term “master bedroom” did not originate as a term for a place where slave masters sleep.
“But that doesn’t mean we can’t have a discussion about whether we can use it now to suggest it anyway,” he added.
CDC’s ‘Comprehensive’ Language Guide Discourages Talking of ‘Alcoholics’, ‘Smokers’, ‘Uninsured’ and ‘Older People’
A New York Times quiz on “harmful” words that asks participants about phrases like “Third World” and “Global South.”
(New York Times)
McWhorter also noted that it was not surprising that the acronyms “AAPI” and “BIPOC” were not accepted by the generals, but instead were the product of “enlightened suggestions” from “educated high-level activists.” I found no.
“It’s no coincidence that I learned all of them on the Columbia campus,” he said.
The discussion of the potential harm of words and their meaning has long been a staple of editorial board and higher education research, but a discussion of what counts as “harmful” can be found here. It’s only gotten worse over the years.
In May, Stanford University announced the “Toxic Language Elimination Initiative,” which aims to “address harmful language in IT at Stanford University.”
This guide covers disabilityism, ageism, colonialism, culturally appropriate, gender-based, inaccurate language, institutionalized racism, people-first, violence, and other considerations. There are 10 “harmful language” sections of the matter.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Words considered harmful include “discontinued,” and the guide states that due to concerns around the word “discontinued,” it should be replaced with “cancelled” or “terminated.”
The guide also states that the word “American” should be replaced with “U.S. citizen”, and that “American” is used when discussing “Americans only”, thereby allowing the United States to live in the Americas. He explains that he is implying that it is the most important country.”
Fox News’ Adam Sabes contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link
