[ad_1]
If you’re trying to avoid “junk apps,” your iPhone is definitely safer. However, “safety” comes at a huge price, which many mobile phone users are unwilling to pay. iPhone users don’t have half the freedom that Android users enjoy. While the iPhone’s fluency and functionality may not be as good as Android’s, we have to admit that the closed nature of the iOS system makes it a safer environment to use. Many consumers buy iPhone devices for this reason. In addition, the iPhone has become more friendly to middle-aged and older users. That said, anyone who got an iPhone for “safety” reasons should start re-evaluating their behavior. With the addition of the new bill, iOS will face some challenges. The system will be as open as Android.
On iOS you can use third party app stores
In March of this year, the EU enacted the Digital Markets Act, which aims to regulate the operations of large internet companies. The bill primarily allows certain gatekeepers, who “act as both referees and players,” to take advantage of their dominant position in data sharing, software installations, platform selection, advertising promotion, etc. It is intended to prohibit profit-making or restricting market competition. If the company violates the regulations, he will be fined 4% to 20% of his global turnover for the financial year.
The advent of the Digital Markets Act means a lot to Apple. Some time ago, according to Bloomberg Mark Gurman’s latest report, Apple began preparing its engineers for new projects. This project is to significantly adjust the App Store strategy on the iPhone. This enables the use of third-party app stores on iPhones and iPads. This allows the device to bypass the App Store and install specific programs.
This change could appear in iOS 17 next year. Allowing iOS users to install apps from outside the App Store is called sideloading. Sideloading allows users to install non-reviewed apps through their own channels (webpages, install his packages, etc.). This is also what Windows and Android use. If Apple fully opens up to sideloading, in other words, it won’t be long before Apple becomes Android.
Giztina news of the week
Cook vehemently rejects sideloading
Earlier, Tim Cook was very firm on the sideloading problem. As he said at his New York Times DealBook Summit: He said, “Automakers who sell cars without airbags or seatbelts are taking too many risks…choosing between a safe and protected platform and an ecosystem that allows sideloading.” please,” he adds.
Additionally, Apple says sideloading is “a cybercriminal’s best friend” and can leave consumers vulnerable to malware, fraud, data tracking and other attacks. In fact, judging by EU legislation, the most important restriction is to prevent Apple from using the App Store to charge high fees for in-app recharges. Game developers themselves do not have distribution channels, so they have to work with distribution platforms, namely app stores. Apple charges developers up to 30%, this is known as the “Apple Tax”.
Apple compromised, but do consumers really like it?
Android system may have many problems, but it’s working fine. So anyone thinking that allowing sideloading on iOS would cause a lot of confusion should think again. During the first few months, users face many problems. However, over time, everything will return to normal.
Taking Android as an example, sideloading causes different version numbers of your app to appear in each app store. This means you can install the app and as soon as you open the app you will be prompted to update to the latest version.
Additionally, iOS’s support for third-party app stores presents serious pricing challenges. Different app stores share software differently. For example, Apple may charge 30%, while other app stores charge 20%. In fact, there are dedicated software and stores that charge as much as 50%. As costs increase, the price of recharging naturally increases. Major app stores will continue to compete with the AppStore, using the iPhone as a battlefield. Only the consumer suffers.
Big impact on security
There are also significant security implications. There is still some illegal software on the AppStore. The AppleStore has always been known for its rigor, which reduces spam apps. For example, when you download an app from a third-party app store, pop-up windows and ads are everywhere. They ask for your address book information and SMS information that can be stolen. This is one of the risks iOS users face.
There is some software that asks for permission to provide various cryptic features to iOS. As a result, the phone crashes due to certain feature conflicts. This common Android phenomenon extends to iOS as well. Will consumers then scold the software or attack Apple? Most likely it will be Apple.
If Apple compromises to the EU’s demands, other countries will naturally put strong pressure on Apple to open up. So if iOS truly offers a third-party app store, users have a big decision to make. Do you want to use the cheaper third-party app store or the more expensive Apple app store?
[ad_2]
Source link
