[ad_1]
“Undermining the ability of individual homeowners to rent property based on need is a disproportionate encroachment on owner rights, discourages homeownership, and represents a slippery slope to government overreach. Banning short-term rentals would have a serious impact on the ability of homeowners to meet their financial obligations and continue to live in cities.”
Adi Talwar
Night view of Manhattan seen over the East River.
On Wednesday, the mayor’s Office of Special Enforcement (OSE) will hold a second hearing to seek input on the potentially final District Law 18. The new law requires short-term rental hosts to register with the city and prohibits booking services from processing transactions. In the case of unregistered properties. Section 18 of the Local Law has significantly curtailed short-term rentals in New York City, allowing individual homeowners with rental units in owner-occupied buildings and large-scale properties that have converted entire buildings into de facto hotels. It does not distinguish from the rental business.
The proposed legislation, now being drafted, is a one-size-fits-all solution to a sensitive problem posed by large rental businesses operating multiple short-term properties in New York City. The current Local Law Section 18 language is a blunt means of causing agitation and stress for individual homeowners. The real target should be large operators competing with powerful hotel lobbies. Local Law 18 is unbalanced and needs to be amended before adoption. This is the last opportunity for the community to speak out to prevent small homeowners and hard-working families from being unfairly penalized for violations of large rental businesses.
Former New York City Councilman Ben Kalos, who defended the first law, admitted in a recent Fox5 interview, “This is really aimed at people who have multiple locations.” More than half of the city’s inventory on Airbnb is reportedly from hosts with multiple listings. The spirit of the law was aimed at tracking down vicious criminals. At the extreme, it was tracking a single “host” with 400 listings. But the interpretation of the law as it is currently being written by the Office of Special Enforcement does not distinguish between these detractors and individual homeowners with a single list of people trying to make ends meet.Fox5 reports shows it right.
New York City’s ever-present housing problem will not be solved by government overreach or overzealous enforcement. Stopping short-term rentals will not add low-income housing to the city’s inadequate inventory. New housing development needs a much larger surge to offset housing shortages for the city’s growing population. Shot” initiative announced. His “Get Stuff Built” initiative plans to address New York City’s housing shortage by accelerating the pace of development, with a target of 500,000 new homes over the next decade.
In contrast, implementation of District Law No. 18 is expected to remove approximately 10,000 short-term rental units from the City’s current inventory. The two efforts are on completely different levels. Few would argue that flagrant violations of New York City’s multi-family housing laws by large rental operators should be cracked down on, but hurting individual homeowners is part of the solution. It shouldn’t be.
Short-term rentals provide small homeowners and local businesses with the significant income they need to reach their goals. They offer affordable options for bringing tourists and visitors to communities with limited hotel supplies. Hosts provide handpicked recommendations of local restaurants and businesses, and offer accommodations with multiple bedrooms and kitchens that are not available or affordable in traditional hotels. It is used by visiting professionals who make long-term visits for businesses who want to live in their home rather than a hotel, as well as visiting nurses and nurses. Strengthen the local economy and provide jobs for maintenance staff.
Many small homeowners choose to offer their additional rental units as short-term rather than long-term, based on their preferences and individual circumstances. Many have large families who use the unit once a year and cannot commit to long-term leases that prevent family and friends from visiting. We are welcoming visitors and those visiting family nearby. Doing away with short-term rentals hurts struggling homeowners, puts homes Hotel lobbies should not be allowed to dictate the cost of tourism or limit affordable options for those wishing to visit our city.
The Mayor’s Office of Special Enforcement must correct course. Section 18 of the Local Law shall not be enforced as written. A distinction is needed between individual homeowners with owner-occupied building units from large commercial rental businesses with multiple listings. Large rental businesses have a disproportionate impact on New York City’s housing supply, competing directly with hotels. Individual homeowners should be allowed to rent units in the owner-occupied building without the restrictions currently proposed in Section 18 of the Local Code. Registration requirements can help differentiate these groups from each other, but penalties and rules should focus on how many listings a host has. Maintained to separate individual homeowners from large rental businesses.
Individual homeowners listed in owner-occupied buildings are not in the same category as commercial landlords with large rental businesses. The proposed limit on all short-term rentals would disproportionately affect individual homeowners compared to large commercial businesses managing multiple listings. Undermining the ability to rent property on a basis is a disproportionate encroachment on owners’ rights, discourages homeownership, and represents a slippery slope to government overreach. Banning short-term rentals would have a serious impact on the ability of homeowners to meet their financial obligations and continue living in cities. That would limit the income spent on local businesses and the vital income visitors bring to the community. These new measures are unfair to homeowners and highly disproportionate to hotels. A balanced law needs to distinguish between individual homeowners with owner-occupied lists and large rental businesses.
Citizens concerned should submit written feedback to OSE and come to the hearing on January 11 to express their support for the individual homeowners listed in the building where the owner resides. Together we can find better solutions that don’t hurt small homeowners and protect them from those who are circumventing the law and exacerbating the city’s housing problems.
David Summers is a Brooklyn homeowner who has been hosting short-term rentals for the past few years. He owns his one building in Park His Slope and lives with his family. Hundreds of visitors have expressed overwhelmingly positive and appreciative comments about their experience staying in his short-term rental units.
[ad_2]
Source link
