[ad_1]
Rudeness is real, not ridiculous.
Former NFL quarterback and current analyst Chris Sims has been undercutting Jalen Hurts since taking on QB1 duties with the Eagles last season. That earned MVP key consideration, leading the team to 14 wins in the 15 games he played, holding off the Giants and earning his first career playoff win en route to the NFC Championship Game. That’s what I did.
Despite this, Sims continues to throw shade.
Yesterday on his podcast, Sims and his co-host Ahmed Fareed ran through an interesting discussion point: If quarterbacks were swapped between the two teams, any of the games in the division round would be different. Will it be the result?
FAREED: Wouldn’t it be different if you swapped quarterbacks? It’s kind of funny. You can do that with all games.I don’t know if any of the games are different.It? can you win with him?
If he was playing for the Eagles and Jalen Hurts was playing for the Giants, how much would the Eagles have won? 20, not yet? maybe closer…
Sims: I don’t think it’s that much of a difference.Because Daniel Jones can do the same thing, I mean, he can do some of the things Jalen hurts.He’s really close. It’s not like, “Oops, it’s much better.” Again, if you ask me who I want as a passer, I prefer Daniel Jones!
What did Jeffrey Lurie say about defining insanity? For two seasons, Sims has been trying to narrate this “Jalen Hurts isn’t that good” mantra. No, every time he says it, he gets more and more wrong.
Is Jones a better passer than Hearts? It’s like trolling for trolling’s sake. For anyone with an eye, Hurts is a better passer, not even close. The numbers back it up. Hurts has more passing yards, passing TDs, and his yards per attempt than Jones. Jones’ completion and interception rates are good, but the difference is very small.
On the eve of the 2021 regular season, Sims released a list of the top 40 NFL quarterbacks. Wounds were not on the list. On the list were Ryan Fitzpatrick, Taysom Hill, Drew Lock, and he was Kellen Mond.
Hearts have come a long way this season. There was enough time for Sims to retract his story or change it entirely. Analysts can admit that their assumptions are wrong. It actually builds your credibility if, after further review, players are willing to admit they’ve proven you wrong.
It’s almost insanity for Sims to cling to this exhausted and very wrong stance. But keep doing it, Chris.
Maybe in a few weeks we’ll be able to critique his Super Bowl MVP speech.
[ad_2]
Source link
